From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Remington v. Mathson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION
Oct 17, 2011
No.09-CV 09-4547 NJV (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No.09-CV 09-4547 NJV

10-17-2011

BRUCE REMINGTON, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MATHSON, JOY MATHSON, Defendants.


NOT FOR CITATION


ORDER VACATING ORAL ARGUMENT

Defendants' motion for summary judgment is set for hearing on November 1, 2011. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the Court takes the motion under submission on the papers.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NANDOR J. VADAS

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Remington v. Mathson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION
Oct 17, 2011
No.09-CV 09-4547 NJV (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Remington v. Mathson

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE REMINGTON, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MATHSON, JOY MATHSON, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

No.09-CV 09-4547 NJV (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)