From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Remington v. Aerofil Technology, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 14, 2010
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00358-WYD (D. Colo. Oct. 14, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-00358-WYD.

October 14, 2010


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon review of the parties' Joint Notice Regarding Pending Claims and Status (ECF No. 159), filed October 13, 2010. Based on the parties' representations made in the joint notice, it is ordered as follows:

It is ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall amend the case caption to reflect that Plaintiffs Valerie Remington and Greg Thomas have pending claims against Defendant Aerofil Technology, Inc. only. All other parties have fully settled their claims. As such, the parties shall file any additional, necessary dismissal documents (so that the record accurately reflects all dismissed parties) with the Court not later than Tuesday, November 16, 2010. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Roanoke Companies Group, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A. Inc.'s Joint Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Fourth Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 108) is DENIED AS MOOT. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Roanoke Companies Group's Cross-Claim against former Defendant SLR, Inc. is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Dated: October 14, 2010


Summaries of

Remington v. Aerofil Technology, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 14, 2010
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00358-WYD (D. Colo. Oct. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Remington v. Aerofil Technology, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VALERIE REMINGTON and GREG THOMAS Plaintiffs, v. AEROFIL TECHNOLOGY, INC…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Oct 14, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-00358-WYD (D. Colo. Oct. 14, 2010)