Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Remington Lodging & Hospitality, LLC v. Southernmost House, Ltd.

206 So. 3d 764 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Remington Lodging & Hospitality, LLC v. Southernmost House, Ltd.

1 Citing case

  1. Suzuki Motor Corp. v. Winckler

    284 So. 3d 1107 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)   Cited 5 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "because the apex doctrine hasn't been adopted in the corporate context, the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of the law" by denying MPO directed to deposition of company president

    We highlight "agency head" and "governmental official" because we have noted before that "no Florida court has adopted the apex doctrine in the corporate context." Fla. Office of Ins. Regulation v. Fla. Dep't of Fin. Servs., 159 So. 3d 945, 951 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) ; see alsoRemington Lodging & Hospitality, LLC v. Southernmost House, Ltd., 206 So. 3d 764, 765 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). We emphasized in that case (though in dicta) "that the government context is distinguishable [from the corporate context] because of separation of powers concerns."