From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Remekie v. Sorber

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 7, 2022
Civil Action 22-79 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 7, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-79

03-07-2022

DONOVAN A. REMEKIE, Petitioner, v. MR. JAIME SORBER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondents.


ORDER

EDWARD G. SMITH, J.

AND NOW, this 7th day of March, 2022, after considering the petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by the pro se petitioner, Donovan A. Remekie (“Remekie”) (Doc. No. 1), Remekie's motion to stay (Doc. No. 3), this court's January 28, 2022 memorandum opinion and order (Doc. Nos. 4, 5), and Remekie's “Rule to Show Cause” (Doc. No. 6); and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The motion to stay (Doc. No. 3) is DENIED;
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Remekie filing a new petition once he has fully exhausted his claims in the state courts;
3. The court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability; and
4. The clerk of court shall MARK this action as CLOSED.


Summaries of

Remekie v. Sorber

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 7, 2022
Civil Action 22-79 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Remekie v. Sorber

Case Details

Full title:DONOVAN A. REMEKIE, Petitioner, v. MR. JAIME SORBER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 7, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 22-79 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 7, 2022)