From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rembert v. Haw. Paroling Auth.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Oct 25, 2019
SCPW-19-0000677 (Haw. Oct. 25, 2019)

Opinion

SCPW-19-0000677

10-25-2019

LAVERNE REMBERT, Petitioner, v. HAWAI'I PAROLING AUTHORITY, Respondent Agency, and STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CASE NO. 1PC041002384) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
()

Upon consideration of petitioner Laverne Rembert's petition for writ of mandamus, filed on October 3, 2019, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that alternative means are available for petitioner to seek relief. See HRPP Rule 40(a)(2). Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the requested extraordinary writ from this court. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai'i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 25, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson


Summaries of

Rembert v. Haw. Paroling Auth.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Oct 25, 2019
SCPW-19-0000677 (Haw. Oct. 25, 2019)
Case details for

Rembert v. Haw. Paroling Auth.

Case Details

Full title:LAVERNE REMBERT, Petitioner, v. HAWAI'I PAROLING AUTHORITY, Respondent…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Oct 25, 2019

Citations

SCPW-19-0000677 (Haw. Oct. 25, 2019)