From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rembert v. Bobby

STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT
Nov 29, 2012
2012 Ohio 5571 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12-MA-159

11-29-2012

WILLIE REMBERT, PETITIONER, v. DAVID BOBBY, RESPONDENT.

APPEARANCES: For Petitioner Attorney Edward L. Littlejohn, Jr. For Respondent Attorney Stephanie L. Watson Assistant Attorney General Criminal Justice Section


OPINION

AND

JUDGMENT ENTRY

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS:
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
JUDGMENT: Dismissed
APPEARANCES:
For Petitioner
Attorney Edward L. Littlejohn, Jr. For Respondent Attorney Stephanie L. Watson
Assistant Attorney General
Criminal Justice Section
JUDGES: Hon. Gene Donofrio
Hon. Joseph J. Vukovich
Hon. Mary DeGenaro
PER CURIAM.

{¶1} Petitioner Willie Rembert has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus against Respondent David Bobby, Warden of the Ohio State Penitentiary in Youngstown, Ohio, claiming he is being unlawfully detained there after serving 28 years of an indefinite sentence of 10 years to life for his convictions following guilty pleas to voluntary manslaughter and murder. The warden has filed a motion to dismiss the petition.

{¶2} In 1984, the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted Rembert in two separate cases. In the first case, the grand jury indicted Rembert for aggravated murder with felony murder and firearm specifications and for rape with a firearm specification in connection with the rape and murder of Sylvia Bolden on February 23, 1984. State v. Rembert, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR190364. In the second case, the grand jury indicted Rembert for aggravated murder with a firearm specification in connection with the murder of Alvin Williams on April 2, 1984. State v. Rembert, Cuyahoga C.P. No. 190273.

{¶3} Rembert subsequently pleaded guilty to amended indictments. In the first case, he pleaded guilty to murder and the trial court sentenced him to an indefinite term of 15 years to life in prison. In the second case, he pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter and the trial court sentenced him to an indefinite term of 10 years to 25 years in prison. The trial court ordered that both sentences be served concurrently with one another.

{¶4} On August 31, 2012, Rembert filed in this court the present petition for writ of habeas corpus arguing that his continued imprisonment amounts to cruel and unusual punishment because he was not the shooter and did not murder Sylvia Bolden. The warden has filed a motion to dismiss.

{¶5} Rembert's petition must be dismissed for two reasons. First, R.C. 2969.25(A) requires an inmate, at the time of commencing a civil action against a government entity, to "file with the court an affidavit that contains a description of each civil action or appeal of a civil action that the inmate has filed in the previous five years in any state or federal court." The Ohio Supreme Court has held that the requirements in R.C. 2969.25 apply to state habeas corpus actions and that even belated attempts to file the required affidavit do not excuse his noncompliance. Fuqua v. Williams, 100 Ohio St.3d 211, 2003-Ohio-5533, 797 N.E.2d 982, ¶ 6-9 ("A habeas corpus action is a civil action and therefore the provisions of R.C. 2969.21 through 2969.27 are applicable to such action.").

{¶6} Here, Rembert, at the time of filing his petition, did not file an affidavit as required by R.C. 2969.25. Thus, as mentioned, compliance with the provisions of R.C. 2969.25 is mandatory and the failure to satisfy the statutory requirements is grounds for dismissal. State ex rel. Washington v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 87 Ohio St.3d 258, 259, 719 N.E.2d 544 (1999); State ex rel. Zanders v. Ohio Parole Bd., 82 Ohio St.3d 421, 422, 696 N.E.2d 594 (1998).

{¶7} The second reason Rembert's petition fails goes to the underlying basis of the petition itself - his claim of innocence. It is well accepted that questions as to the guilt or innocence of one convicted of a crime cannot be raised in a habeas corpus proceeding. Jackson v. Maxwell, Warden, 174 Ohio St.2d 32, 186 N.E.2d 725 (1962).

{¶8} For the foregoing reasons, Respondent's motion to dismiss is granted and Rembert's petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby dismissed.

{¶9} Costs taxed against Rembert. Final order. Clerk to serve notice on the parties as required by the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure. Donofrio, J. concurs. Vukovich, J. concurs. DeGenaro, J. concurs.


Summaries of

Rembert v. Bobby

STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT
Nov 29, 2012
2012 Ohio 5571 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Rembert v. Bobby

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE REMBERT, PETITIONER, v. DAVID BOBBY, RESPONDENT.

Court:STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT

Date published: Nov 29, 2012

Citations

2012 Ohio 5571 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)