From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rejaee v. Costco Price Club

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 28, 2016
140 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

06-28-2016

Masoud REJAEE, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. COSTCO PRICE CLUB, Defendant–Appellant.

Gallagher, Walker, Bianco & Plastaras, LLP, Mineola (Dominic Bianco of counsel), for appellant. Melucci, Celauro & Sklar, LLP, Garden City (Daniel Melucci of counsel), for respondent.


Gallagher, Walker, Bianco & Plastaras, LLP, Mineola (Dominic Bianco of counsel), for appellant.

Melucci, Celauro & Sklar, LLP, Garden City (Daniel Melucci of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan A. Madden, J.), entered July 1, 2015, which, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant Costco Price Club (Costco) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Plaintiff alleges that after shopping at Costco for at least 20 minutes, one of the wheels of his shopping cart fell off. According to plaintiff, he was injured when he tried to keep the cart from falling over.

Costco established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting, inter alia, plaintiff's testimony that he noticed nothing wrong with the cart when he began using it, until one of its wheels began to wobble 10 minutes later. Accordingly, Costco showed that the defect was not visible and apparent, and did not exist for a sufficient amount of time for it to discover and remedy it (see Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837, 501 N.Y.S.2d 646, 492 N.E.2d 774 [1986] ; Cataldo v. Waldbaum,

Inc., 244 A.D.2d 446, 664 N.Y.S.2d 126 [2d Dept.1997] ).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Contrary to the motion court's finding, plaintiff did not testify that he told a Costco employee of the wheel after it began to wobble, but only that he asked an employee if he could use the employee's cart. Plaintiff's wife also testified that neither she nor plaintiff ever informed any Costco employee of a problem with the cart.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., ANDRIAS, SAXE, RICHTER, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rejaee v. Costco Price Club

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 28, 2016
140 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Rejaee v. Costco Price Club

Case Details

Full title:Masoud REJAEE, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. COSTCO PRICE CLUB…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 28, 2016

Citations

140 A.D.3d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
33 N.Y.S.3d 710
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5101

Citing Cases

Romero v. Alezeb Deli Grocery, Inc.

To succeed on a summary judgment motion in such a case, the owner is generally required to show that it…

Perkins v. Hillspring LLC.

At trial, the plaintiff must establish that the owner owed him a duty which it breached, and thereby, caused…