From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reitz v. State

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 16, 2011
3:11-cv-00117-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. May. 16, 2011)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00117-LRH-RAM.

May 16, 2011


ORDER


Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. (#9) entered on March 24, 2011, recommending dismissing this action with prejudice and entering judgment accordingly. Plaintiff filed her Objections to Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge (#11) on April 8, 2011, and her Amended Objections to Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge (#12) on April 14, 2011. No response to the objections was filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections, pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#9) entered on March 24, 2011, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#9) entered on March 24, 2011, is adopted and accepted, and therefore

IT IS ORDERED THAT this case is DISMISSED with prejudice and that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Reitz v. State

United States District Court, D. Nevada
May 16, 2011
3:11-cv-00117-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. May. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Reitz v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBIN M. REITZ, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: May 16, 2011

Citations

3:11-cv-00117-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. May. 16, 2011)