From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reitman v. Poulakidas

Appellate Court of Illinois
Feb 20, 1947
330 Ill. App. 616 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)

Opinion

Gen. No. 43,850. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed February 20, 1947 Released for publication March 28, 1947

REFERENCE, § 21defendants' right to proceed with evidence after chancellor's adverse ruling on motion to dismiss. In hearing before master, where motion to dismiss is made by defendants at close of plaintiff's evidence, master is without authority to rule on motion but should submit it to chancellor for decision, and under 1941 amendment to Civil Practice Act, such motion does not prevent defendants from offering evidence to support their defense in event decision on motion is adverse to them, and court should not enter final judgment, but should remand cause to master with directions to proceed with taking of evidence in behalf of defendants (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1945, ch. 110, par. 188(4); Jones Ill., Stats. Ann. 104.064).

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and number.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. DONALD S. McKINLAY, Judge, presiding.

Decretal judgment reversed in toto and cause remanded with directions. Heard in the second division, first district, this court at the October term, 1946.

Irving Breakstone, for appellants;

Ignatz Spitz, for appellees.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed February 20, 1947; released for publication March 28, 1947.


Summaries of

Reitman v. Poulakidas

Appellate Court of Illinois
Feb 20, 1947
330 Ill. App. 616 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)
Case details for

Reitman v. Poulakidas

Case Details

Full title:Paul H. Reitman and Nell Reitman, Wife, Appellees, v. George D. Poulakidas…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Feb 20, 1947

Citations

330 Ill. App. 616 (Ill. App. Ct. 1947)
71 N.E.2d 913