From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reitemeyer v. Marcalus

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 27, 1945
44 A.2d 25 (N.J. 1945)

Opinion

Argued May 22d 1945.

Decided September 27th, 1945.

The question involved on appeal being moot, appeal dismissed.

On appeal from the Court of Chancery.

Messrs. Koestler Koestler ( Mr. Samuel Koestler, of counsel), for the complainants-respondents.

Messrs. Wall, Haight, Carey Hartpence ( Mr. John A. Hartpence and Mr. William W. Shaw, of counsel), for the defendants-appellants.


The appellants, husband and wife, appeal from a decree of the Court of Chancery ordering them specifically to perform a contract to sell real estate.

It appears from an examination of the state of case on this appeal and the motion papers heretofore filed in this court that the question is moot. The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

For modification — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, COLIE, WELLS, RAFFERTY, DILL, FREUND, JJ. 12.


Summaries of

Reitemeyer v. Marcalus

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 27, 1945
44 A.2d 25 (N.J. 1945)
Case details for

Reitemeyer v. Marcalus

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT F. REITEMEYER and JULIA A. REITEMEYER, his wife…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 27, 1945

Citations

44 A.2d 25 (N.J. 1945)
44 A.2d 25

Citing Cases

Petrozello v. Davis

However, in view of the importance of the controversy here existing the interests of justice require…