From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reisman, Peirez Reisman v. Haralampoudis

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50560 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)

Opinion

2003-710 QC.

Decided June 3, 2004.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the Civil Court, Queens County (A. Gazzara, J.), entered February 24, 2003, which denied its motion for summary judgment on its cause of action for an account stated.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

PRESENT: ARONIN, J.P., GOLIA and RIOS, JJ.


Plaintiff commenced this action to recover legal fees. The Civil Court denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on its account stated cause of action. Inasmuch as the parties disagree as to whether defendant Demetrios Haralampoudis a/k/a Jim Haralampoudis is liable for the legal fees incurred for plaintiff's representation of James Haralampoudis in an underlying action, there is an issue of fact as to who is liable for said fees. In addition, since courts possess the authority to supervise the charging of fees for legal services ( see Collier, Cohen, Cyrstal Bock v. MacNamara, 237 AD2d 152), based upon our review of the record, we find there is an issue of fact as to the reasonableness of the legal fees plaintiff is seeking to collect. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was properly denied.


Summaries of

Reisman, Peirez Reisman v. Haralampoudis

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 3, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50560 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)
Case details for

Reisman, Peirez Reisman v. Haralampoudis

Case Details

Full title:REISMAN, PEIREZ REISMAN, L.L.P., Appellant, v. WILLIAM HARALAMPOUDIS and…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 3, 2004

Citations

2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50560 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)