From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reinhardt v. Schuster

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 6, 1948
192 Misc. 919 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)

Opinion

July 6, 1948.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, DI PIRRO, J.

Theodore Nevins for appellant.

Lawrence Braunstein and Werner Rosenberg for respondent.


Essentially the respondent's action is based on a promise of marriage; therefore, the action is not maintainable. ( Andie v. Kaplan, 288 N.Y. 685, affg. 263 A.D. 884.) Judgment and order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

HAMMER, HOFSTADTER and EDER, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Reinhardt v. Schuster

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jul 6, 1948
192 Misc. 919 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)
Case details for

Reinhardt v. Schuster

Case Details

Full title:TONI L. REINHARDT nee HERBST, Respondent, v. EVELYN SCHUSTER, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jul 6, 1948

Citations

192 Misc. 919 (N.Y. App. Term 1948)
81 N.Y.S.2d 570

Citing Cases

Nosonowitz v. Kahn

types and forms of action growing out of or arising out of an agreement to marry irrespective of the grounds…

Nosonowitz v. Kahn

to prohibit all types and forms of action growing out of or arising out of an agreement to marry…