Reily v. Whorton

Full title: JAMES CARL REILY, Plaintiff, v. GLEN WHORTON, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Jan 18, 2008

3:06-CV-00214-PMP-VPC (D. Nev. Jan. 18, 2008)

Opinion

3:06-CV-00214-PMP-VPC.

January 18, 2008

ORDER

PHILIP PRO, District Judge

Before the Court for consideration are Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #6) filed July 2, 2007. On December 17, 2007, the Honorable Valerie P. Cooke United States Magistrate Judge, entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #9) recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #6) be granted. Plaintiff James Carl Reily did not file a response thereto failing to exhaust his administrative remedies.

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that Magistrate Judge Cooke's Report of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #9) should be Affirmed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #6) is hereby GRANTED.