From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reilly v. Long Island Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 25, 2000
275 A.D.2d 767 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued May 16, 2000.

September 25, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Long Island Railroad appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty J.), dated June 29, 1999, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 4404(a) to set aside the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and against it on the grounds that it was against the weight of the evidence and that the amount of damages awarded was excessive, and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered July 16, 1999, which, upon the jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against it in the principal sum of $152,000.

McCabe Collins McGeough Fowler, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Patrick M. Murphy of counsel), for appellant.

Decolator, Cohen DiPrisco, LLP, Mineola, N.Y. (Joseph L. Decolator of counsel), for respondents.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, SONDRA MILLER, ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501[a][1]).

The jury properly determined that the broken glass at the appellant's train station was a recurring dangerous condition of which the appellant could be charged with constructive notice (see, Weisenthal v. Pickman, 153 A.D.2d 849). The appellant's contention that the verdict was not supported by legally sufficient evidence is without merit (see, Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493).

The award of damages was not excessive, as it did not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (see, Chase v. City of New York, 233 A.D.2d 474; Reynolds v. Merit Oil of N.Y., 167 A.D.2d 521).


Summaries of

Reilly v. Long Island Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 25, 2000
275 A.D.2d 767 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Reilly v. Long Island Railroad

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS G. REILLY, ETC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. LONG ISLAND RAILROAD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 25, 2000

Citations

275 A.D.2d 767 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
714 N.Y.S.2d 231

Citing Cases

BONVINO v. LONG IS. COLL. HOSP.

Weisenthal v. Pickman, 153 AD2d 849, 545 NYS2d 369, (2nd Dept 1989). See also Reilly v. Long Island R.R., 275…