From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reilly v. Hyster Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 31, 1975
307 So. 2d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. 73-1407.

January 31, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Roger A. Baker, J.

James N. Carter and Nolan Carter, of Carter, Anstine, Martin Barnett, Orlando, for appellants.

Ronnie H. Walker, of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D'Aiuto Dean, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.


It appears that the notice of appeal in this cause was not timely filed and, therefore, we must dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

A jury verdict was returned on May 22, 1972, in favor of defendants-appellees. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial. A final judgment for the defendants, reciting therein that the plaintiff's motion for new trial was thereby denied, was filed September 28, 1972. The following day the judgment was assigned a book and page and duly recorded this being the rendition date. Rule 1.3, F.A.R. Thereafter, on October 4, 1972, plaintiff filed a motion for rehearing of the denial of her motion for new trial. The motion for rehearing was denied by order entered November 12, 1973. Notice of appeal was filed within thirty (30) days of this latter date.

The rules make no provision for a motion for rehearing addressed to an order denying on the merits a proper and timely filed motion for new trial and, thus, appellant's motion for rehearing filed October 4, 1972, did not have the effect of tolling the rendition date of the final judgment. The notice of appeal, having been filed more than thirty (30) days after the rendition date, was untimely and therefore this court lacks jurisdiction of the appeal.

Lee v. Elliott, Fla.App. 1963, 155 So.2d 169; Volumes in Value, Inc. v. Buy Mail International, Inc., Fla.App. 1965, 177 So.2d 511; and DePadro v. Moore, Fla.App. 1968, 215 So.2d 27.

Wagner v. Bieley, Wagner Associates, Inc., Fla. 1972, 263 So.2d 1.

State ex rel. Diamond Berk Ins. Agency v. Carroll, Fla. 1958, 102 So.2d 129.

Gratuitously, we observe that appellant has shown no error in the order denying her motion for new trial, the sole point raised on appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

DOWNEY, J., and SEAY, RUSSELL E., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Reilly v. Hyster Company

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 31, 1975
307 So. 2d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Reilly v. Hyster Company

Case Details

Full title:SHIRLEY T. REILLY ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. HYSTER COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 31, 1975

Citations

307 So. 2d 202 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

Markevitch v. Van Harren

Assuming, as the appellants argue, that their second motion for rehearing merely amended the first and was a…

Gordon v. Richter

Richter is correct in positing that an order granting or denying a new trial is not subject to a motion for…