From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reilly v. Griffith

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 3, 1948
61 A.2d 235 (N.J. 1948)

Opinion

Submitted May 28th, 1948.

Decided September 3d 1948.

On appeal from a decree of the Court of Chancery.

Mr. Emory S. Kates, for the respondents.

Mr. Henry S. Ross ( Mr. Albert E. Scheflen, of counsel), for the appellants.


The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Woodruff, and reported at 141 N.J. Eq. 154. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, WACHENFELD, EASTWOOD, BURLING, JACOBS, WELLS, DILL, FREUND, McLEAN, SCHETTINO, JJ. 13.

For reversal — COLIE, J. 1.


Summaries of

Reilly v. Griffith

Court of Errors and Appeals
Sep 3, 1948
61 A.2d 235 (N.J. 1948)
Case details for

Reilly v. Griffith

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH B. REILLY et al., respondents, v. WILLIAM B. GRIFFITH et al.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Sep 3, 1948

Citations

61 A.2d 235 (N.J. 1948)
61 A.2d 235

Citing Cases

Whitmore v. N.J. Div. of Motor Vehicles

The right of public sale enlarges on the common law right of possession of a lienholder. Lanterman v. Luby,…

Puritan Dairy Products Co. v. Christoffers

" See also, Reilly v. Griffith, 141 N.J. Eq. 154, 169 ( Ch. 1947), affirmed 142 N.J. Eq. 724 ( E. A. 1948);…