From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reilly and Reilly

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 2, 1987
741 P.2d 933 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

86-132-NJ-1; CA A42672

Argued and submitted July 17, 1987.

Affirmed as modified September 2, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Jackson County, L.A. Merryman, Judge.

Argued and submitted July 17, 1987.

Daniel L. Harris, Ashland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Davis, Ainsworth, Pinnock, Davis Gilstrap, P.C., Ashland.

William G. Carter, Medford, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Grant, Ferguson, Carter, P.C., Medford.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed as modified. Costs to wife.


Paragraph 2(A) of the decree dissolving the parties' marriage is modified to provide that wife is entitled to six consecutive weeks' visitation each summer until the child is six years of age, at which time visitation shall be eight consecutive weeks. Paragraph 2(F)(1) is modified to provide that the parties will each bear one-half of the cost of transportation for the summer, Christmas and spring visitation periods, over and above any remuneration or travel benefits husband receives through his government employment.

Affirmed as modified. Costs to wife.


Summaries of

Reilly and Reilly

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 2, 1987
741 P.2d 933 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Reilly and Reilly

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Marriage of REILLY, Appellant, and REILLY, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 2, 1987

Citations

741 P.2d 933 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)
741 P.2d 933