From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reilley v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1948
273 App. Div. 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

May 10, 1948.

Present — Lewis, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.


In an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff-wife's falling on snow and ice, the jury awarded a verdict to her and also to her husband in a companion action for loss of services. The defendant appeals, urging that the cause of action was barred by reason of the fact that it was not commenced within one year after it accrued, as required by subdivision c of section 394a-1.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appellant is precluded from setting up the above defense because of its failure to plead it in the answer or to move to amend at the trial. ( Arnold v. Village of North Tarrytown, 137 App. Div. 68, affd. 203 N.Y. 536; Dickins v. City of New York, 228 App. Div. 853.)


Summaries of

Reilley v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1948
273 App. Div. 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Reilley v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MARY E. REILLEY et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 1948

Citations

273 App. Div. 1014 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Rubino v. City of New York

Therefore, even assuming that an informal appearance is a form of estoppel, in a proper case such estoppel…

MATTER OF HUIE

The claim for the taking of claimant's easement, however, was not filed "within three years after title…