Opinion
3:12-cv-00218-LRH-VPC
03-22-2013
ROBERT M. REIGER, Petitioner, v. DWIGHT NEVENS, et al., Respondents.
ORDER
This action is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, by a Nevada state prisoner.
Respondents seek a third extension of time, up to and including April 11, 2013, to file a response to petitioner's motion for leave to file a supplement. (ECF No. 28). Having reviewed the motion and good cause appearing, respondents' motion is granted.
Respondents also seek a third extension of time to file and serve their response to the first amended petition. (ECF No. 27). Respondents seek an enlargement of time, up to and including April 11, 2013 to file and serve a response to the first amended petition. Having reviewed the motion and good cause appearing, respondents' motion is granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents' motion for a third extension of time to file a response (ECF No. 28) to petitioner's motion to supplement is GRANTED. The response to petitioner's motion to supplement shall be filed on or before April 11, 2013.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' motion for a third extension of time to file a response (ECF No. 27) to the first amended petition is GRANTED. The response to the first amended petition shall be filed on or before April 11, 2013.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no further extensions shall be granted in the absence of extraordinary circumstances.
_________________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE