From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 22, 2011
No. C 11-03505 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-03505 CRB

11-22-2011

MARTIN GARDNER REIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORP. ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER REGARDING SERVICE

Prior to the hearing on Defendant Microsoft Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (dkt. 10), Plaintiff Martin Reiffin moved for entry of default as to Defendants William H. Gates, III and Steven A. Ballmer. See dkts. 31, 32. The Clerk of the Court declined to enter default as to those Defendants. See dkts. 33, 34. Thereafter, the Court granted Defendant Microsoft's Motion to Dismiss. See dkt. 39. Defendants Gates and Ballmer have yet to appear in this case, and so the Court held a case management conference on November 18, 2011 to inquire as to the status of those remaining Defendants. See dkt. 48. Plaintiff maintained that he had properly served Defendants Gates and Ballmer, and that the Court has jurisdiction over them.

In light of the Clerk of the Court's declination to enter default, the Court is particularly concerned about the issue of service. Specifically, Plaintiff represents that he served Defendant Gates by serving an individual named Todd Mischke, a private investigator "[a]uthorized by William H. Gates to accept all legal service of process on his behalf." See dkt. 31 at 3 (Proof of Service). Similarly, Plaintiff represents that he served Defendant Ballmer by serving an individual named Ron Rhoades, a property manager at Defendant Ballmer's residence "[a]uthorized by Steven A. Ballmer to accept all legal service of process on his behalf." See dkt. 32 at 3 (Proof of Service). The Court is not satisfied that such service was proper. Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to take the depositions of Mischke and Rhoades in order to establish that they are "agent[s] authorized by appointment . . . to receive service of process" under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e)(2)(C) for Defendants Gates and Ballmer respectively. Plaintiff shall file the deposition transcripts with the Court within sixty (60) days of this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CHARLES R. BREYER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 22, 2011
No. C 11-03505 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN GARDNER REIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORP. ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 22, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-03505 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2011)