Opinion
October, 1926.
Present — Clarke, P.J., Merrell, Finch, Martin and Burr, JJ.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
REIF v. RUTENBERG
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Summaries of
REIF v. RUTENBERG
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1926
218 App. Div. 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for
REIF v. RUTENBERG
Case Details
Full title:LOUIS REIF, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. JACOB RUTENBERG, Appellant
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Oct 1, 1926
Citations
218 App. Div. 722 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)