From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reid v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 9, 2016
Case No. 2:14-cv-02151-APG-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 9, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:14-cv-02151-APG-CWH

11-09-2016

SHARON REID, Plaintiff, v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE

On October 18, 2016, Magistrate Judge Hoffman entered a report and recommendation in which he recommends I dismiss plaintiff Sharon Reid's complaint with prejudice because she has failed to participate in discovery despite multiple opportunities to do so. ECF No. 42. Reid did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).

I nevertheless find that Judge Hoffman sets forth the proper legal analysis and factual basis for the decision.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judge Hoffman's report and recommendation (ECF No. 42) is accepted. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

DATED this 9th day of November, 2016.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Reid v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 9, 2016
Case No. 2:14-cv-02151-APG-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 9, 2016)
Case details for

Reid v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC

Case Details

Full title:SHARON REID, Plaintiff, v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 9, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:14-cv-02151-APG-CWH (D. Nev. Nov. 9, 2016)