From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reichman v. McDonough

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Sep 21, 2006
Case No. 3:06cv155/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 21, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06cv155/RV/EMT.

September 21, 2006


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated August 31, 2006. Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) is GRANTED.

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Reichman v. McDonough

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Sep 21, 2006
Case No. 3:06cv155/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 21, 2006)
Case details for

Reichman v. McDonough

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E. REICHMAN, Petitioner, v. JAMES R. McDONOUGH, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Sep 21, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:06cv155/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. Sep. 21, 2006)

Citing Cases

First Mut. Grp., LP v. Firestone

See Prunty v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc., No. 2:15-cv-105-FtM-29DNF, 2015 WL 3509351, *2 (M.D. Fla. June 4,…