Reichert v. State Farm Ins. Co.

Full title: DEBORAH REICHERT, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM INS. CO., Defendant

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 29, 2011

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3832 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 29, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3832.

March 29, 2011

ORDER

JOEL SLOMSKY, District Judge

AND NOW this 29th day of March 2011, upon consideration of the Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment filed by the parties (Doc. Nos. 11, 12), Defendant's Reply (Doc. No. 14), the Joint Stipulation of Facts submitted by the parties (Doc. No. 10), and the exhibits (Doc. Nos. 10, 16), and after a hearing held on March 7, 2011, it is ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED.

2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED.

3. The Clerk of Court shall ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. It is the Judgment of the Court that Plaintiff is not entitled to stack the UIM benefits of her insurance policy with the UIM benefits of the insurance policy of her parents.

4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE the case.