From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reichert v. Sheridan

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jul 21, 1994
645 A.2d 1018 (Conn. 1994)

Opinion

(14970)

Decided July 21, 1994


The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 34 Conn. App. 521 (AC 12150), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Whether the Appellate Court properly interpreted General Statutes § 31-293 of the Workers' Compensation Act in that an employee's independent cause of action against a third party tortfeasor would be barred if he failed to join an action commenced by his employer thirty days after notice that such action was commenced?

"2. Whether General Statutes § 31-293, flit shortens the statute of limitations, violates article first, §§ 10 and 20 of the Connecticut constitution and the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution?

"3. Whether the notice sent to the plaintiff met the requirements of General Statutes § 31-293 in that the notice (a) was sent by an agent for the insurance carrier and not the employer, and (b) misidentified the party bringing the suit as the insurance carrier?"


Paul W. Smith, in support of the petition.

Joseph Dieso, in opposition.


Summaries of

Reichert v. Sheridan

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Jul 21, 1994
645 A.2d 1018 (Conn. 1994)
Case details for

Reichert v. Sheridan

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS REICHERT v. JAMES J. SHERIDAN, JR

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jul 21, 1994

Citations

645 A.2d 1018 (Conn. 1994)
645 A.2d 1018

Citing Cases

Reichert v. Sheridan

"3. Whether the notice sent to the plaintiff met the requirements of General Statutes § 31-293 in that the…