From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reichenbach v. Rosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 2, 1996
226 A.D.2d 121 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 2, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (James O'Donoghue, J.).


Plaintiff's failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to their claim that defendants had notice of the defective condition of the steps ( see, Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836). Nor does the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur apply ( see, Crosby v. Stone, 137 A.D.2d 785, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 807).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Reichenbach v. Rosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 2, 1996
226 A.D.2d 121 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Reichenbach v. Rosen

Case Details

Full title:GERALD REICHENBACH et al., Appellants, v. MORRIS ROSEN et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 2, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 121 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 925