Summary
finding that lower court erroneously refused to admit into evidence New York State Department of Labor regulations in products liability action against manufacturer
Summary of this case from Almonte v. Averna Vision & Robotics, Inc.Opinion
April 24, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Imperato, J.H.O.).
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
The parties' 18-year-old son, having attained the age of majority, can no longer be the subject of a custody order (see, Domestic Relations Law § 2; Adamec v. Adamec, 81 A.D.2d 600; Markland v. Markland, 67 A.D.2d 940, mod on other grounds 48 N.Y.2d 851). The issues raised on appeal are therefore academic (cf., Leff v. Leff, 144 A.D.2d 544). Lawrence, J.P., Sullivan, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.