From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reich v. Mortgage Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1933
168 S.E. 814 (N.C. 1933)

Opinion

(Filed 12 April, 1933.)

APPEAL by defendant from Stack, J., at September Term, 1932, of FORSYTH.

Hoyle C. Ripple for plaintiff.

Efird Liipfert for defendant.


Civil action to recover penalty for usury.

The defendant being a foreign corporation, service of summons was sought to be obtained through the Secretary of State as provided by C. S., 1137.

The defendant entered a special appearance and moved to dismiss the action for want of proper service.

Upon evidence sufficient to support the findings, the court found "that the defendant owned property and was doing business at, before and since the starting of this suit and the service of said process, in the State of North Carolina," and upon such findings overruled the motion to dismiss. Defendant appeals, assigning errors.


Affirmed on authority of Lunceford v. Association, 190 N.C. 314, 129 S.E. 805, R. R. v. Cobb, 190 N.C. 375, 129 S.E. 828. See note, Yale Law Journal (April, 1927), page 882.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Reich v. Mortgage Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1933
168 S.E. 814 (N.C. 1933)
Case details for

Reich v. Mortgage Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ETHEL REICH v. HOME MORTGAGE CORPORATION

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 1, 1933

Citations

168 S.E. 814 (N.C. 1933)
168 S.E. 814

Citing Cases

Ruark v. Trust Co.

It is conceded that the Virginia Trust Company, a foreign corporation and defendant herein, has no process…

Denton v. Vassiliades

3 S.E. 609; Smith v. Haughton, ibid., 587, 174 S.E. 506; McCollum v. Stack, 188 N.C. 462, 124 S.E. 864; Motor…