From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rego v. Connecticut Insurance Placement Facility

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 23, 1990
582 A.2d 203 (Conn. 1990)

Opinion

Decided October 23, 1990


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 22 Conn. App. 428, is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Was the Appellate Court correct in determining that an insurer's special defense of material misrepresentation must be proven by clear and convincing evidence?

"2. Was the Appellate Court correct in determining that the trial court's limiting instruction to the jury to consider only misrepresentations `related to the cause and origin of the fire' as proof of the special defense, thereby excluding certain evidence, was not likely to have misled the jury?"

Stephen E. Goldman and Linda Morkan, in support of the petition.

Joseph A. Mengacci, in opposition.


Summaries of

Rego v. Connecticut Insurance Placement Facility

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 23, 1990
582 A.2d 203 (Conn. 1990)
Case details for

Rego v. Connecticut Insurance Placement Facility

Case Details

Full title:ZELIA S. REGO v. CONNECTICUT INSURANCE PLACEMENT FACILITY

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Oct 23, 1990

Citations

582 A.2d 203 (Conn. 1990)
216 Conn. 824

Citing Cases

Rego v. Connecticut Insurance Placement Facility

We granted certification, limited to the following issues: "(1) Was the Appellate Court correct in…