From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Regets v. City of Plymouth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-11746 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-11746

12-13-2012

NEILEIGH REGETS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PLYMOUTH, et al., Defendants.


DISTRICT JUDGE SEAN F. COX


MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARK A. RANDON


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE (DKT. NO. 36)

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Exclude Christopher Kish's Statement (Dkt. No. 36). Defendants filed a response (Dkt. No. 38), Plaintiff's replied (Dkt. No. 42), and Defendants filed a sur-reply (Dkt. No. 48). The Court heard oral argument on December 13, 2012.

For the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED.

IT IS ORDERED.

_______________

MARK A. RANDON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served on the parties of record on this date, December 13, 2012, by electronic and/or first class U.S. mail.

Melody R. Miles

Case Manager to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon

(313) 234-5540


Summaries of

Regets v. City of Plymouth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-11746 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Regets v. City of Plymouth

Case Details

Full title:NEILEIGH REGETS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PLYMOUTH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 13, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-11746 (E.D. Mich. Dec. 13, 2012)