From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Regent Music Corp. v. Dehine Productions S.A.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 12, 2021
20-CV-4608 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-4608 (VSB)

01-12-2021

REGENT MUSIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. DELPHINE PRODUCTIONS S.A. et al., Defendants.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge

On January 11, 2021, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). “[W]hen a plaintiff properly amends [a] complaint after a defendant has filed a motion to dismiss that is still pending, the district court has the option of either denying the pending motion as moot or evaluating the motion in light of the facts alleged in the amended complaint.” Pettaway v. Nat'l Recovery Sols., LLC, 955 F.3d 299, 303-04 (2d Cir. 2020). Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that Defendants shall file a letter within seven (7) days deciding whether their motion to dismiss should be deemed moot without prejudice to refile a new motion to dismiss in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), or if I should evaluate Defendants' current motion to dismiss in light of the facts alleged in the amended complaint.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Regent Music Corp. v. Dehine Productions S.A.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 12, 2021
20-CV-4608 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Regent Music Corp. v. Dehine Productions S.A.

Case Details

Full title:REGENT MUSIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. DELPHINE PRODUCTIONS S.A. et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 12, 2021

Citations

20-CV-4608 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2021)