Opinion
1968-22S
01-27-2023
STEVEN ANTHONY REGAS, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
ORDER
Eunkyong Choi Special Trial Judge
On January 12, 2022, petitioner filed a petition with the Court in which he checked boxes indicating he wished to dispute multiple IRS notices. A review of the record shows that petitioner received a Notice of Deficiency and no other notices. We will therefore dismiss this case as to the irrelevant notices as the Court lacks jurisdiction over those.
Upon due consideration of the record in the above-docketed matter, and for cause, it is hereby
ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to Notice of Determination Concerning Collections Action. It is further
ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as to Notice of Final Determination for [Full/Partial] Disallowance of Interest Abatement Claim (Or Failure of IRS to Make Final Determination within 180 Days After Claim for Abatement).