Opinion
Argued October 17, 1933 —
Decided January 12, 1934.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 109 N.J.L. 1.
For the appellants, Samuel Koestler.
For the respondents, Martin P. O'Connor.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.