From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Regan v. Gurich

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 17, 1995
1995 OK 110 (Okla. 1995)

Opinion

No. 86116.

October 17, 1995.


ORDER

The Motion to Supplement Record tendered by respondent/State Insurance Fund is granted.

Original jurisdiction is assumed. Let the writ of mandamus issue. The respondent/judge of the Workers' Compensation Court is hereby directed to set for hearing the petitioner's Motion to Reopen for change of condition for the worse in Court Number 92-14325A. The trial judge was in error when she denied the petitioner the status of a pauper solely on the basis of his being represented by counsel. The fact that the petitioner is represented by counsel does not in and of itself foreclose his right to proceed in forma pauperis. Okla. Const. art. II, § 6; Brown v. Burkett, 750 P.2d 481, 483 (Okla. 1988); McMullin v. Department of Corrections, 863 P.2d 1187, 1189 (Okla. 1993).

ALMA WILSON, C.J., KAUGER, V.C.J., HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS, HARGRAVE, OPALA and WATT, JJ., concur Vote on Motion to Supplement Record and For Publication.

SUMMERS, J., dissents Vote on Motion to Supplement Record and For Publication.


Summaries of

Regan v. Gurich

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Oct 17, 1995
1995 OK 110 (Okla. 1995)
Case details for

Regan v. Gurich

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK REGAN, PETITIONER, v. NOMA D. GURICH, JUDGE OF THE WORKERS…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 17, 1995

Citations

1995 OK 110 (Okla. 1995)
1995 OK 110