From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Regan Goldfarb Heller Wetzler v. Dolgin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 4, 1976
52 A.D.2d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

May 4, 1976


Motion granted and, upon reargument, the second paragraph of the memorandum decision on Appeal No. 1990 (March 18, 1976) is amended to read as follows: "The complaint herein contains 18 causes of action, in which plaintiff seeks to recover for services rendered to defendants in six matters on the theories of agreed value (contract), quantum meruit and account stated. Six causes of action were withdrawn by stipulation to be consolidated for trial in a related action and the remaining causes were submitted to the jury."

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Kupferman, Lupiano, Birns and Capozzoli, JJ.


Summaries of

Regan Goldfarb Heller Wetzler v. Dolgin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 4, 1976
52 A.D.2d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Regan Goldfarb Heller Wetzler v. Dolgin

Case Details

Full title:REGAN GOLDFARB HELLER WETZLER QUINN v. JORDAN H. DOLGIN et al

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 4, 1976

Citations

52 A.D.2d 766 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)