Opinion
2:20-cv-00051-GMN-EJY
07-24-2023
REFLEX MEDIA, INC., a Nevada corporation, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RICHARD EASTON LIMITED, a Delaware corporation, et al., Defendants.
SF FIRM, LLP Mark L. Smith Attorneys for Plaintiffs Richard Easton, personally
SF FIRM, LLP Mark L. Smith Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Richard Easton, personally
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF UNRESOLVED CLAIMS
Plaintiffs Reflex Media, Inc., and Clover8 Investments PTE. LTD. (collectively “Reflex”), and Defendant Richard Easton, hereby stipulate to dismiss the outstanding, unresolved claims from Reflex's Complaint. This stipulation is based on the following facts:
1. Reflex filed this case on January 9, 2020, against the following defendants:
a. Richard Easton, an individual;
b. Richard Easton Limited, a Delaware corporation;
c. Maria Jose Diaz, an individual;
d. Nelida Tejeda Alvarez, an individual, and
e. Jorge Osbaldo Rodriguez, an individual.(ECF 1.)
2. On December 28, 2020, default was entered against Richard Easton Limited. (ECF 30.)
3. On April 29, 2022, default was entered against Maria Jose Diaz, Nelida Tejeda Alvarez, and Jorge Osbaldo Rodriguez. (ECF 59.) Thus, Richard Easton is the only remaining defendant to this case.
4. On April 6, 2022, Reflex filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on Claims I-VII (the “Motion ”). (ECF 58.)
5. On November 21, 2022, the Court granted, in part, Reflex's Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF 68.)
6. Reflex did not move for summary judgment on its Eighth of Action (for Intentional Interference with Contractual Relations) or Ninth Cause of Action (for violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse act).
The parties now hereby stipulate and agree, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. that Reflex's Eight and Ninth Causes of Action are dismissed. In light of the foregoing, the parties also request that the settlement conference scheduled of February 2, 2023, be vacated.
* * *
IT IS SO ORDERED.