From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Refai v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 11, 2013
No. 2:08-cv-01096-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-01096-PMP-PAL

01-11-2013

MOHAMED MAJED CHEHADE REFAI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.

DANIEL G. BOGDEN United States Attorney Nevada Bar No.:2137 CARLOS A. GONZALEZ Assistant United States Attorney SARAH E. WHITMAN UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Attorneys for Defendants the United States and Peter Lazaro


DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
Nevada Bar No.:2137
CARLOS A. GONZALEZ
Assistant United States Attorney
SARAH E. WHITMAN
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Attorneys for Defendants the United States and Peter Lazaro

REQUEST FOR EXCEPTION

TO ORDER SCHEDULING A

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

The United States and Peter Lazaro, by and through their counsel, respectfully request that they be exempted from the Court's requirements in its September 19, 2012 Order Scheduling a Settlement Conference that "[c]ounsel of record, individual parties, and a fully authorized representative shall appear in person" for the scheduled January 24, 2013 settlement conference and shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement in preparation for the conference. ECF No. 260 at 1,2; ECF No. 261. The claims against both Peter Lazaro and the United States have been dismissed from this case. It is unclear whether the Court's September 19, 2012 Order nonetheless applies to the United States, Peter Lazaro and their counsel. Because all claims against Peter Lazaro and the United States have been dismissed and they have no legal interest in the claims that will be adjudicated in the upcoming trial scheduled for March 12, 2013, they respectfully request that the Court exempt them from the requirement that they and their counsel participate in, and submit settlement statements in preparation for, the January 24, 2013 settlement conference.

On March 1, 2010, the district court granted the United States' motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 133. The court's order disposed of all remaining claims asserted against the United States in this action. Id.; see also ECF No. 89 (Second Am. Compl.). On that same day, the district court granted Peter Lazaro's Motion to Dismiss. ECF No. 132. That order dismissed all claims asserted against Peter Lazaro in this action. Id.

The claims that remain for trial are those Plaintiff asserts against the City of North Las Vegas and the North Las Vegas Police Department. See ECF No. 249 (Pretrial Order) at 2. Following the issuance of the Pretrial Order on September 10, 2012, this case was referred to this Court for a settlement conference. ECF Nos. 249, 250. In this Court's September 19, 2012 Order Scheduling a Settlement Conference, this Court ordered all counsel of record "who will be participating in the trial ..., all parties appearing pro se, if any, and all individual parties must be present." ECF No. 260 at 1. Later in that same Order, the Court stated that unless the Court grants a request for exception, "[c]ounsel of record, individual parties, and a fully authorized representative shall appear in person" for the scheduled January 24, 2013 settlement conference and prepare settlement conference statements. Id. at 1-2. To the extent the Court's September 19, 2012 Order extends beyond the parties bound for trial, for the reasons articulated above, the United States, Peter Lazaro and their counsel respectfully request an exemption from it.

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL G. BOGDEN

United States Attorney

_______________

CARLOS A. GONZALES

Assistant United States Attorney

333 Las Vegas Blvd. South, Suite 5000

Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

Tel: 702-388-6336

carlos.gonzalez2@usdoj.gov

SARAH E. WHITMAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Civil Division, Torts Branch

P.O. Box 7146, Ben Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044

Tel: 202-616-0089

Fax: 202-616-4314

sarah.whitman@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendants the United States

and Peter Lazaro

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of January, 2013.

_______________

Peggy A. Leen

United States Magistrate Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 9, 2013, I filed the foregoing electronically through the CM/ECF system, which caused the following parties or counsel to be served by electronic means, as more fully reflected on the Notice of Electronic Filing:

Rohit K. Singla

Email: rohit.singla@mto.com

Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP

560 Mission Street, 27th Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Audrey Daniel

Email: Adaniel@lccr.com

Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

131 Steuart St., Ste 400

San Francisco, California 94105

Peter L. Ashman

Email: pla@ashmanlaw.com

Law Offices of Peter L. Ashman

617 S. 8th St., Ste B

Las Vegas, Nevada 89101-7082

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Robert W Freeman, Jr.

Email: rwfreeman@cox.net

1060 Wigwam Parkway

Henderson, Nevada 89074

Attorney for City of North Las Vegas;

City of North Las Vegas Police Department

_______________

CARLOS A. GONZALES

Assistant United States Attorney


Summaries of

Refai v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 11, 2013
No. 2:08-cv-01096-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Refai v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MOHAMED MAJED CHEHADE REFAI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 11, 2013

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-01096-PMP-PAL (D. Nev. Jan. 11, 2013)