Reeves v. Jenkins

7 Citing cases

  1. Gasrock Capital, L.L.C. v. Endevco Eureka, L.L.C.

    Case Number: 110291 (Okla. Civ. App. Nov. 18, 2013)

    §144. Those liens are effective from the date of the furnishing of the first item of material and the date of the performance of the first labor. Reeves v. Jenkins, 1968 OK 46, ¶8, 439 P.2d 941, 944. Section 287.8 provides in pertinent part as follows:

  2. Gasrock Capital, L.L.C. v. Endevco Eureka, L.L.C.

    313 P.3d 1028 (Okla. Civ. App. 2013)

    “Such lien shall be preferred to all other liens or encumbrances which may attach to or upon said leasehold for oil and gas purposes ...” § 144. Those liens are effective from the date of the furnishing of the first item of material and the date of the performance of the first labor. Reeves v. Jenkins, 1968 OK 46, ¶ 8, 439 P.2d 941, 944..Section 287.8 provides in pertinent part as follows:

  3. Highpointe Energy, LLC. v. Viersen

    2021 OK 32 (Okla. 2021)   Cited 2 times

    The Viersens argue that the fact that the trustee was served should not affect the outcome because the bankruptcy court would have had to give him permission to take corrective action. Hall v. Main, 34 F.2d 528 (E.D. Ill. 1929); Rhodes v. Elliston, 29 F.2d 737; Reeves v. Jenkins, 1968 OK 4, 439 P.2d 941. This is precisely the point.

  4. Bailey v. Campbell

    1991 OK 67 (Okla. 1992)   Cited 29 times
    In Bailey v. Campbell, 829 P.2d 667 (Okla. 1991), this Court held that due process required notice before taking default when a responsive pleading appeared in the record.

    Association of St. Croix Condominium Owners v. St. Croix Hotel Corp., 682 F.2d 446, 448 (3rd Cir. 1982); In re Lampkin, 116 B.R. 450 (D.Md. 1990); In re: White Motor Credit Corp., 37 B.R. 631 (N.D. Ohio 1984), aff'd, 761 F.2d 270 (6th Cir. 1985); [1978] U.S. Code Cong. Ad. News 5787, 5963, 6296-97.Reeves v. Jenkins, 439 P.2d 941, 945 (Okla. 1968).Viersen v. Boettcher, 387 P.2d 133, 137 (Okla.

  5. Loffland Bros. Co. v. Overstreet

    1988 OK 60 (Okla. 1988)   Cited 27 times

    Thus, Loffland pleaded and established a valid and subsisting debt against Overstreet, under this State's laws.Hedlund v. Brogan, 167 Okla. 393, 30 P.2d 164 (1934); Reeves v. Jenkins, 439 P.2d 941 (Okla. 1968). Loffland's petition did not expressly request pre-judgment interest.

  6. Tiger Flats Production v. Oklahoma Petroleum

    1985 OK 105 (Okla. 1985)   Cited 5 times
    In Tiger Flats, the operator of a § 287.1 unit sued lessees for a personal money judgment and foreclosure of lien against their leasehold interest for their failure to pay their proportionate share of unit expenses.

    The undisputed evidence shows that Tiger pleaded and established a valid and subsisting debt against each individual appellant. Hedlund v. Brogan, 167 Okla. 393, 30 P.2d 164 (1934); Reeves v. Jenkins, 439 P.2d 941 (Okla. 1968). In view of the fact the OPEC Group admitted it never intended to pay its share of unit expenses, and never attempted to remove themselves from unit participation, we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion.

  7. State ex rel. Madrid v. UU Bar Ranch Ltd. Partnership

    137 N.M. 719 (N.M. Ct. App. 2005)   Cited 12 times
    Holding that failure to comply with a clear, unambiguous and mandatory statutory requirement or condition precedent invalidated the subsequent action

    Disposition is equated with surrender or abandonment elsewhere in the law. See Reeves v. Jenkins, 439 P.2d 941, 945 (Okla. 1968) (stating that "[a] bankruptcy receiver ordinarily has no power to surrender, abandon, or make some other disposition of property"); see also Regents of the Univ. of N.M. v. N.M. Fed'n of Teachers, 1998-NMSC-020, ¶ 27, 125 N.M. 401, 962 P.2d 1236 (recognizing that the plain language of a statute is the primary indicator of legislative intent). Second, Defendant cannot simply ignore the fact that if the Road were truly abandoned, title to the Road would revert to another, which we assume, without deciding, would be Defendant as the abutting landowner.