From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reeves v. Frost

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1897
24 App. Div. 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Opinion

December Term, 1897.


Judgment of the County Court of Oswego county reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the Justice's Court affirmed, with costs. Held, that there was some evidence in the Justice's Court tending to support the verdict of the jury and the County Court improperly reversed the justice's judgment. (ee Schoonmaker v. Spencer, 54 N.Y. 366; Halsey v. Hart, 85 Hun, 46; City of Brooklyn v. The B.C. N.R.R. Co., 11 App. Div. 168; Staples v. Hager, Id. 631; Fandel v. Third Ave. R.R. Co., 15 id. 426; Ludlum v. Couch, 10 id. 603; Rogers v. Ackerman, 22 Barb. 134.) All concurred, except Green, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Reeves v. Frost

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 1, 1897
24 App. Div. 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
Case details for

Reeves v. Frost

Case Details

Full title:Thomas J. Reeves and Samuel Benson, Appellants, v. Amelia F. Frost…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1897

Citations

24 App. Div. 632 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)