From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reeves v. Metro. Det. Ctr. Brooklyn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 2, 2015
15-CV-3262 (ENV) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 2, 2015)

Opinion

15-CV-3262 (ENV)

07-02-2015

MICHAEL DUKE REEVES, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER OF BROOKLYN, WARDEN OF METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER BROOKLYN, CASE MANAGER JOHN DOE JANE DOE, ABC CORPORATION, and XYC CORPORATION, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

On May 29, 2015, pro se plaintiff Michael Duke Reeves, currently detained at the Orange County Jail in Goshen, New York, commenced this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. However, plaintiff did not include a Prisoner Authorization form in support of his application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). The Prison Litigation Reform Act requires an incarcerated plaintiff, who has not paid the filing fee, and seeking to proceed IFP, not only to submit an IFP application but also a Prisoner Authorization form with the filing fee to be paid in installments. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(2) and (b)(1). Failure to do so is grounds for dismissal of the plaintiff's complaint. See Razzoli v. Exec. Office of U.S. Marshals, No. 10-CV-4269 (CBA), 2010 WL 5051083, at *3 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 2, 2010).

By letter dated June 4, 2015, the Clerk's Office provided Reeves with a Prisoner Authorization form and advised him that, in order for his case to proceed, he must return a signed Prisoner Authorization form within 14 days from receipt of the letter. To date, Reeves has not filed a signed Prisoner Authorization. Instead, on June 15, 2015, Reeves filed a second application to proceed IFP, which does not comply with the Clerk's letter directing plaintiff to file a signed Prisoner Authorization form.

Conclusion

For these reasons, this action is dismissed without prejudice, provided that plaintiff complies with all applicable laws and rules that are preconditions to filing.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED. Dated: Brooklyn, New York

July 2, 2015

s/Eric N. Vitaliano

ERIC N. VITALIANO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Reeves v. Metro. Det. Ctr. Brooklyn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 2, 2015
15-CV-3262 (ENV) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Reeves v. Metro. Det. Ctr. Brooklyn

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DUKE REEVES, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 2, 2015

Citations

15-CV-3262 (ENV) (E.D.N.Y. Jul. 2, 2015)