From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reeves v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Nov 17, 2021
No. 280-20S (U.S.T.C. Nov. 17, 2021)

Opinion

280-20S

11-17-2021

Erin Jennifer Reeves, Petitioner and Russ Patrick Reeves, Intervenor v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER AND DECISION

Lewis R. Carluzzo Chief Special Trial Judge

For cause, it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for extension of time, filed November 1, 2021, is moot. It is further

ORDERED that although this case has been dismissed for lack of prosecution as to the intervenor, the intervenor remains a party to the case. That being so it is further

ORDERED that respondent's motion to change or correct caption, filed November 2, 2021, is denied. Consistent with the basis of settlement agreed upon the parties as reflected in the above-referenced proposed stipulated decision, now treated as a stipulation of settlement, it is further

ORDERED and DECIDED: That for 2017, there is a $4,843 deficiency in petitioner's Federal income tax before the application of I.R.C. §6015(c), and that after the application of I.R.C. § 6015(c), there is no deficiency in petitioner's Federal income tax, and petitioner's Federal income tax has not been overpaid.


Summaries of

Reeves v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Nov 17, 2021
No. 280-20S (U.S.T.C. Nov. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Reeves v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Erin Jennifer Reeves, Petitioner and Russ Patrick Reeves, Intervenor v…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

Citations

No. 280-20S (U.S.T.C. Nov. 17, 2021)