From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reeves v. Colvin

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
May 27, 2016
No. 15-3289 (8th Cir. May. 27, 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-3289

05-27-2016

Amie Reeves Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration Defendant - Appellee


Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City [Unpublished] Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Amie Reeves appeals the district court's order affirming the denial of supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. Upon de novo review, see Lott v. Colvin, 772 F.3d 546, 548-49 (8th Cir. 2014), we conclude that the two narrow issues Ms. Reeves identifies do not provide a basis for reversing the administrative law judge's (ALJ's) determination that she is not disabled. To warrant remand, a claimant must show prejudice from an error during administrative proceedings, see Samons v. Astrue, 497 F.3d 813, 821 (8th Cir. 2007); and an ALJ's failure to cite certain evidence does not indicate that the evidence was not considered, see Craig v. Apfel, 212 F.3d 433, 436 (8th Cir. 2000). The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. --------


Summaries of

Reeves v. Colvin

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
May 27, 2016
No. 15-3289 (8th Cir. May. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Reeves v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:Amie Reeves Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: May 27, 2016

Citations

No. 15-3289 (8th Cir. May. 27, 2016)

Citing Cases

Moss v. Berryhill

Even if an ALJ's decision contains internal inconsistencies, the error must be prejudicial to justify…