From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reeve v. Court of Common Pleas of Phila. Cnty.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Aug 22, 2016
No. 97 EM 2016 (Pa. Aug. 22, 2016)

Opinion

No. 97 EM 2016

08-22-2016

OMAR REEVE, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, Respondent


ORDER

AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Review in the Nature of a Complaint in Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.


Summaries of

Reeve v. Court of Common Pleas of Phila. Cnty.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Aug 22, 2016
No. 97 EM 2016 (Pa. Aug. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Reeve v. Court of Common Pleas of Phila. Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:OMAR REEVE, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Aug 22, 2016

Citations

No. 97 EM 2016 (Pa. Aug. 22, 2016)