From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reese v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 20, 1992
592 So. 2d 326 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-3068.

January 3, 1992. Motion for Rehearing/Clarification Denied February 20, 1992.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Richard D. Eade, Judge.

Earnest Reese, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


We accept jurisdiction of this late-filed appeal since the trial court did not state in its order denying post-conviction relief that the movant had a right to appeal within thirty days of rendition of the order. See Rule 3.850(f), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure; State ex rel. Shevin v. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District, 316 So.2d 50 (Fla. 1975); Cox v. State, 583 So.2d 822 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

We have considered appellant's argument on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not err when it denied his motion for post-conviction relief. Accordingly we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

DELL, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reese v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 20, 1992
592 So. 2d 326 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Reese v. State

Case Details

Full title:EARNEST REESE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 20, 1992

Citations

592 So. 2d 326 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)