From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reese v. Sierra

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 2005
17 A.D.3d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-02016.

April 11, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Brian Reese appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oliver, J.), dated December 19, 2003, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Prudence Orla, Inc., doing business as West Cove Seafood Restaurant, which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Dinkes Schwitzer, New York, N.Y. (Richard C. Becker of counsel), for appellant.

Curtis Vasile Devine McElhenny, Merrick, N.Y. (Christopher M. Hart of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Luciano and Fisher, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured when the vehicle in which he was a passenger was involved in a one-car accident. The driver, Stephen Sierra, was later convicted of driving while intoxicated. Before the accident, the plaintiff purchased alcoholic beverages for Sierra at Salivar's Bar and they continued to drink at Prudence Orla, Inc., doing business as West Cove Seafood Restaurant (hereinafter West Cove). The plaintiff commenced this action against, among others, Sierra, West Cove, Salivar's Bar, and Nenita D. Laurio, the owner of the vehicle. The plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that West Cove served alcoholic beverages to Sierra while he was visibly intoxicated in violation of General Obligations Law § 11-101, the Dram Shop Act. The Supreme Court granted that branch of the motion of West Cove which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it on the ground that "the plaintiff caused or procured Sierra's intoxication." We agree.

Since the plaintiff procured an alcoholic beverage for the person whose intoxication caused the automobile accident, he has no cognizable cause of action predicated upon a violation of the Dram Shop Act ( see Lebron v. Ballinger's, Inc., 253 AD2d 854; Prunty v. Keltie's Bum Steer, 163 AD2d 595; Campbell v. Step/Lind Rest. Corp., 143 AD2d 111; Vandenburg v. Brosnan, 129 AD2d 793).


Summaries of

Reese v. Sierra

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 11, 2005
17 A.D.3d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Reese v. Sierra

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN REESE, Appellant, v. STEPHEN SIERRA et al., Defendants, and PRUDENCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 11, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 439 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
792 N.Y.S.2d 629

Citing Cases

Pineda v. Javar Corp.

The Supreme Court properly granted the respondents' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the…