From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reese v. Dept. of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 18, 1983
455 A.2d 232 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)

Opinion

January 18, 1983.

Motor vehicles — Revocation of motor vehicle operator's license — Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. § 1542 — Habitual offender — Single episode.

1. The license of a motor vehicle operator is properly revoked under habitual offender provisions of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa. C. S. § 1542, when he has incurred three convictions of certain denominated offenses, arising from three distinct acts within the stated time period, and it is immaterial that such acts occurred during one continuous episode. [247]

Submitted on briefs November 15, 1982, to President Judge CRUMLISH, JR. and Judges MacPHAIL and DOYLE, sitting as a panel of three.

Appeal, No. 298 C.D. 1980, from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of York County in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Kenneth P. Reese, No. 78 S 1935.

Suspensions and revocation of motor vehicle operator's license by Department of Transportation appealed by licensee to the Court of Common Pleas of York County. Appeal dismissed. CASSIMATIS, J. Licensee appealed to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Held: Affirmed.

Samuel K. Gates, Frankel Gates, for appellant.

Harold H. Cramer, Assistant Counsel, with him Ward T. Williams, Chief Counsel, Jay C. Waldman, General Counsel, and Francis P. Bach, for appellee.


This is an appeal by Kenneth P. Reese (Appellant) from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of York County which affirmed the action of the Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety (Department) suspending and revoking Appellant's operating privileges.

On September 6, 1977, Appellant operated his vehicle in a manner which resulted in four separate convictions for violations of the Vehicle Code. On January 31, 1978, the Department issued a notice of a six-month suspension for Appellant's violation of Section 3734 of the Vehicle Code (Code). On May 16, 1978, the Department issued an additional six-month suspension, pursuant to Section 1544(b) of the Code, as a result of Appellant's conviction for violating Section 3733 of the Code. Thereafter, on June 9, 1978, the Department imposed an additional twenty-five day suspension for Appellant's violation of Section 3362 of the Code. Finally, after receiving certification of a second conviction for violating Section 3734 of the Code, the Department issued a five-year revocation, pursuant to Section 1542 of the Code. The suspensions ran consecutively and the revocation became effective immediately following the suspensions.

75 Pa. C. S. § 3734. This section prohibits driving without lights to avoid identification or arrest.

75 Pa. C. S. § 1544(b). This section provides for an extension of an existing period of suspension.

75 Pa. C. S. § 3733. This section prohibits fleeing or attempting to elude a police officer.

75 Pa. C. S. § 3362. This section prohibits speeds in excess of maximum speed limits. Appellant was convicted of travelling in excess of 100 m.p.h. in a posted 35 m.p.h. zone.

75 Pa. C. S. § 1542. This section provides for the revocation of a habitual offender's license.

Appellant did not attempt to obtain a supersedeas of the Department's actions. The consecutive periods of suspension have been served, and the Appellant is in the process of serving the five-year revocation.

Appellant first questions the application of Section 1542 of the Code which in pertinent part provides:

(a) General rule. — The department shall revoke the operating privileges of any person found to be a habitual offender pursuant to the provisions of this section. A "habitual offender" shall be any person whose driving record, as maintained in the department, shows that such person has accumulated the requisite number of convictions for the separate and distinct offenses described and enumerated in subsection (b) committed after the effective date of this title and within any period of five years thereafter.

(b) Offenses enumerated. — Three convictions arising from separate acts of any one or more of the following offenses committed either singularly or in combination by any person shall result in such person being designated as a habitual offender. . . .

Of the three convictions required to gain habitual offender status, two of Appellant's convictions concern the same conduct, i.e., driving without lights to avoid identification or arrest. These two convictions, both of which are the result of Appellant's actions on September 6, 1977, were entered by different jurisdictions. The Appellant drove without his headlights to avoid the police in each of two municipalities. Appellant argues that he does not come within the purview of Section 1542 because these convictions do not arise from separate acts as required by Subsection (b), as set forth above. We are not persuaded by this argument. Although there was but one episode, there were three acts which resulted in three convictions for violations enumerated by Section 1542 and this is sufficient to render the operator an habitual offender. Weaver v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety, 52 Pa. Commw. 625, 416 A.2d 628 (1980); Brewster v. Department of Transportation, 52 Pa. Commw. 112, 415 A.2d 922 (1980). These separate and distinct offenses are not merged into a single act merely because the Appellant's conduct occurred during one continuous episode. See Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Auman, 59 Pa. Commw. 468, 430 A.2d 373 (1981).

Appellant's conviction for speeding in violation of Section 3362, which constitutes the fourth conviction from the episode of September 6, 1977, is not included as an offense enumerated by Section 1542 of the Code, and therefore is not one of the three convictions which resulted in the revocation of Appellant's license.

Appellant's second argument suggests that multiple suspensions for the same episode constitutes an abuse of discretion. We must also reject this argument as without merit. See, Weaver; Brewster.

ORDER

NOW, January 18, 1983, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of York County in the above referenced matter, dated February 5, 1980, is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

Reese v. Dept. of Transportation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 18, 1983
455 A.2d 232 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)
Case details for

Reese v. Dept. of Transportation

Case Details

Full title:Kenneth P. Reese, Appellant v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of…

Court:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 18, 1983

Citations

455 A.2d 232 (Pa. Cmmw. Ct. 1983)
455 A.2d 232

Citing Cases

Drogowski v. Commonwealth

Finally, Appellant's argument that he cannot be considered a "habitual offender" because his three…

Commonwealth v. Bishop

Separate and distinct offenses are not merged into a single act merely because Bishop's conduct occurred…