From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reese v. Daikin Comfort Techs. Distribution

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 19, 2024
2:24-CV-00050 AB (MARx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-CV-00050 AB (MARx)

11-19-2024

MARTRAY REESE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. DAIKIN COMFORT TECHNOLOGIES DISTRIBUTION INC, a Texas Corporation, and DOES 1 through 20, Inclusive, Defendants.


Complaint Filed: November 29, 2023

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

HONORABLE ANDRE BIROTTE JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(h), it is ordered that this action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice as to all claims, causes of action, and parties, with each party bearing that party's own attorney's fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Reese v. Daikin Comfort Techs. Distribution

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 19, 2024
2:24-CV-00050 AB (MARx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Reese v. Daikin Comfort Techs. Distribution

Case Details

Full title:MARTRAY REESE, an individual, Plaintiff, v. DAIKIN COMFORT TECHNOLOGIES…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 19, 2024

Citations

2:24-CV-00050 AB (MARx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2024)