From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reese v. County of Sacramento

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 23, 2015
2:13-cv-0559 JAM DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)

Opinion


ROBERT I. REESE, JR., Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-0559 JAM DAD United States District Court, E.D. California. March 23, 2015

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         On March 20, 2015, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of plaintiff's motion for leave to exceed the deposition limit and motion to compel. Attorney Stewart Katz appeared on behalf of the plaintiff and attorneys John Whitefleet and Taylor Rhoan appeared on behalf of the defendants.

         Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. Plaintiff's motion for leave to exceed the ten deposition limit (Dkt. No. 32) is granted in part and denied in part as stated on the record; and

         2. Plaintiff's motion to compel (Dkt. No. 33) is denied without prejudice to renewal.


Summaries of

Reese v. County of Sacramento

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 23, 2015
2:13-cv-0559 JAM DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Reese v. County of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT I. REESE, JR., Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 23, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-0559 JAM DAD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2015)