From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

REES ET AL. v. STATE

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 27, 1929
112 Tex. Crim. 41 (Tex. Crim. App. 1929)

Opinion

Nos. 12175, 12176, 12177, 12178

Delivered January 23, 1929. Rehearing denied February 27, 1929.

1. — Forfeiture of Appearance Bond — Practice on Appeal.

The same identical question is presented, as well as same parties appellant in all four of the above numbered and entitled causes, and the same disposition is made of each case, for the same reasons.

2. — Same — Continued.

On appeal from judgments forfeiting appearance bond it is the uniform holding of this court that briefs must be filed in the trial court, and in this court in compliance with the law and rules governing civil cases, or a waiver of such filing must appear of record in the absence of which the appeal will be dismissed, as is now ordered in all of the above numbered causes. See Art. 2283 R. C. S. 1925, Art. 856 C. C. P. 1925, Lewis et al. v. State, 7 S.W. Rep. 2d 74 and Bratton et al. v. State, 4 S.W. Rep. 2d 562.

ON REHEARING.

3. — Same — Continued.

Upon the authorities cited in opinion on motion for rehearing in A. F. Rees, et al. v. State, No. 12175, this day decided, the motion for rehearing in the present case, is overruled.

Appeal from the District Court of Bee County. Tried below before the Hon. T. M. Cox, Judge.

Appeal from final judgments upon forfeiture of appearance bonds. Dismissed.

The opinion states the case.

Tarleton Lowe of Corpus Christi, for appellants.

A. A. Dawson of Canton, State's Attorney, for the State.


This is an appeal from a final judgment upon forfeiture of an appearance bond.

The record fails to show that any briefs were filed by appellants in the trial court. We fail to find a waiver by the state of such filing. Moreover, no brief is on file in this court. It is the uniform holding of this court that in cases such as this briefs must be filed in the trial court and in this court in compliance with the law and rules governing civil cases, or a waiver of such filing must appear of record. Article 2283, Revised Civil Statutes 1925; Article 856 C. C. P.; Lewis et al. v. State, 7 S.W.2d 74; Bratton et al. v. State, 4 S.W.2d 562.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.


Upon the authorities cited in the opinion on motion for rehearing in A. F. Rees, et al., v. State, No. 12,175, this day decided, the motion for rehearing in the present case is overruled.

Overruled.


Summaries of

REES ET AL. v. STATE

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 27, 1929
112 Tex. Crim. 41 (Tex. Crim. App. 1929)
Case details for

REES ET AL. v. STATE

Case Details

Full title:A. F. REES ET AL. v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 27, 1929

Citations

112 Tex. Crim. 41 (Tex. Crim. App. 1929)
41 S.W.2d 857