From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reep v. Allison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 30, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2892 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2892 GEB DAD P

07-30-2012

NATHAN OLNEY REEP, Petitioner, v. WARDEN K. ALLISON, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's July 2, 2012 request for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 27) is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.

________________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Reep v. Allison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 30, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-2892 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Reep v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN OLNEY REEP, Petitioner, v. WARDEN K. ALLISON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 30, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2892 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2012)